What’s on your holiday wish list?
- Safer use of opioids!
- Better identification and management of blood clots!
- Improved health for all!
What’s on your holiday wish list?
An outbreak of lung injuries among e-cigarette users across the United States has focused national attention on the potential dangers of vaping, prompting the federal government and some states to take policy steps in response.
According to the CDC, e-cigarettes (also known as e-cigs, e-hookahs, vapes, vape pens, tank systems, or mods) have become extremely popular. The increase in their use may be attributed, among other factors, to the perception that e-cigarettes are not harmful, do not contain nicotine, and may help cigarette smokers quit smoking.
Family caregivers want their loved ones to have the best care possible – at the doctor’s office, at the hospital, and at home. We encourage family caregivers across the country to ask questions, explore options and share in the care decisions that affect the health and well‐being of their loved ones.
Articles the Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety (PPAHS) has been reading this past week provide cause for concern about our healthcare system.
The Cause of the Opioid Epidemic – When Profit is More Important Than People
Information obtained from a legal challenge from The Washington Post and the owner of the Charleston Gazette-Mail in West Virginia has revealed disturbing details of the cause of the opioid epidemic. According to the Washington Post:
By Michael Wong (Founder/Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety)
Eight years ago, I started Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety (PPAHS) with the goal of improving patient safety. Initially focused on opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD), PPAHS has added as key initiatives blood clots and alarm fatigue. As well, we and our collaborating clinicians have addressed many other patient safety issues, including sepsis, sharps injuries, pressure ulcers, pain management, COPD, nursing shortages, and maternal mortality. Our advocacy has been through a diverse range of mediums and venues, such as through conference presentations, articles, blogs, social media, podcasts and videos.
By Michael Wong, JD (Founder/Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety)
This week marks the 8th anniversary of Amanda Abbiehl’s tragic death. Her story continues to remind us of the need for continuous electronic monitoring for all patients receiving opioids and more generally of the need for the adoption of new technologies and practices to improve patient safety.
Editor’s note: In this guest article, RJ Burr discusses how to avoid opioids and surgery for back pain.
By RJ Burr, DC, Cert. MDT, CSCS
The Opioid Epidemic. I’m sure you’ve heard of it and it’s very likely you have a personal experience whether it’s you or someone you know who has been affected by the opioid crisis.
Per the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), Every day, more than 130 people in the United States die after overdosing on opioids.
Editor’s Notes: In this article, Michael Wong, JD (Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety) discusses why we need more nurses and better equipped nurses to improve patient safety and care.
By Michael Wong, JD (Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety)
Happy Nurses Week!
As an advocate for patient monitoring, I am often asked how much I value nurses. More particularly, people often ask me – is PPAHS trying to replace nurses with technology?
It’s no secret that in today’s health care market, insurance companies are calling the shots.
As a pediatrician in private practice for almost two decades, I’ve seen insurance companies transform into perhaps the single most powerful player in today’s health care landscape—final arbiters whose decisions about which procedures or medications to authorize effectively end up determining the course of patient care. Decisions made by insurers, such as MassHealth, have literally killed patients. But it was only when I got caught in the crosshairs of an insurance company auditor with a bone to pick that I fully appreciated their power to also destroy physicians’ careers.
My own nightmare began around two years ago, when my late father, also a physician with whom I was in practice, and I opened our Silverdale clinic on a Saturday. It was the start of flu season, and we’d just received 100 doses of that year’s flu shot. Anxiety about the flu was running high following the death of a local girl from a particular virulent strain of the virus a year before, and parents were eager to get their kids immunized as soon as possible.
Under Washington law, adults don’t even need to see their doctors to get flu shots. They can get them at Walgreens, directly from pharmacists. But because children under nine are more susceptible to rare but life-threatening allergic reactions, they must be immunized by a physician. This meant that, for convenience sake, parents often scheduled their kids’ annual checkup on flu shot day, thus allowing them to condense much of their routine care into a single visit.
That particular Saturday went off without a hitch, with my father and I seeing and immunizing around 60 patients between the two of us over a 12-hour day.
Three months later, a representative from Regence insurance company requested to see some of the patient charts from that flu clinic as part of an audit. Aimed at rooting out insurance fraud by cross checking doctors’ records, these audits have become a routine fixture in medical practices today. To incentivize their auditors to ferret out the greatest possible number of irregularities, and thus boost the corporate bottom line, auditors work on commission, being paid a percentage of the funds they recover.
The Regence auditor in charge of my case, Anke Menzer-Wallace, failed to turn up any irregularities in our documentation. But, still, Ms. Menzer-Wallace issued a stern admonition to my father and me, ordering us not to open our clinic on Saturdays to administer flu shots.
This struck me as an outrageous restriction, considering our clinic is a private entity where we set our own hours and schedule accordingly, and so I called Ms. Mezner-Wallace. But instead of backing down, she ratcheted up her rhetoric, saying she was also forbidding me from examining my patients before immunizing them—clearly, a bid to save her employer even more money. I was shocked. Ms. Mezner-Wallace’s directive amounted to practicing medicine without a medical license—which is of course illegal in the state of Washington and many other states across the nation.
I shot back that immunizing infants and small children is a serious undertaking, requiring proper caution and care, informed her there was no way I would be complying with her mandate. Following this brief exchange, Ms. Menzer-Wallace took it upon herself to report me to the Medical Quality Assurance Board–the government-backed body charged with shielding the public from unqualified or unfit doctors. The accusation levied against me? Not following an insurance company mandate—which, in her opinion, amounted to unprofessional conduct.
It didn’t matter that the charges against me were ludicrous. The potential consequences were only too real, and potentially catastrophic. Had the State Medical Board decided against me, I could have lost my license. I hired a lawyer, sinking more than $8,000 into legal fees. I was cleared last month by a unanimous committee vote. But other physicians facing similar situations may not be as lucky.
The 18 months of excruciating stress that followed my altercation with Ms. Menzer-Wallace made it patently clear that insurance companies wield far too much power. Bureaucrats are making life-and-death medical decisions without a single minute of medical training, and their auditors are terrorizing physicians, by coercing state medical boards to act as their henchman. Unfettered by any consequences for enforcing policies that fly in the face of rules protecting patient safety, insurance companies will continue to harm doctors and patients alike if no one can stop them.
Editor’s Note: This editorial from the desk of PPAHS’s Executive Director urges clinicians to do better at detecting patient deterioration. Patient monitoring is a combination of the use of technology in the hands of clinicians adequately trained on its use.
By Michael Wong, JD (Founder and Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety)
ECRI Institute recently released its “2019 Top 10 Patient Safety Concerns.” In releasing its top 10 patient safety concerns, ECRI said:
This annual top 10 list helps organizations identify looming patient safety challenges and offers suggestions and resources for addressing them.
One of these 10 patient safety concerns in ECRI’s list is – Detecting Changes in a Patient’s Condition.
Why is this important?
Like a canary in a coal mine to detect carbon monoxide and other toxic gases, which alerted miners of potential dangers, being alerted to a change in a patient’s conditions provides the opportunity for clinicians to intervene.