Amanda was 18-years-old when she was admitted to hospital for a severe case of strep throat. To help her manage the pain, she was placed on a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The next morning, she was found unresponsive and died. Though PCA pumps are designed to deliver an exact dosage of opioid – in Amanda’s case, hydromorphone – getting the ‘right’ dosage is not a simple task. Too high a dosage can lead to respiratory depression, sometimes in minutes. Read More
In 2005, Paul Buisson, a celebrated Quebec animator and cameraman died as a result of opioid-related respiratory depression. What lessons can we learn more than a decade later? Read More
As founder and executive director PPAHS, when I speak at conferences about the Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety support for continuous electronic monitoring of patients receiving opioids, I am often asked two questions:
- Is PPAHS suggesting or recommending that technology replace nurses?
- Why has continuous monitoring been so slow to be adopted by hospitals?
The following is a position statement published by PPAHS. If you would prefer to view our statement as a PDF, please click here.
Much of the public attention has been focused on the harm caused by prescription use and abuse of opioids. However, there is another facet that must be focused on: opioid-induced respiratory depression in clinical settings. This includes patients undergoing moderate and conscious sedation, or recovering from procedures and managing pain using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, particularly those during the postoperative period. Read More
When preventable medical errors occur, one of the very first questions asked by patients, families, the legal system, the press, and the public is: “were appropriate care standards met?”. As a professional Registered Nurse, I look at this question from a quality and patient safety perspective to ask what could have been done differently? What are the best practice medical standards, and why are they not applied across the US health care systems? How applicable should the medical standard of care be? And how do we, as clinicians and patient advocates, define the best practice standard of care?
The reality is that the definition of best practice and standard of care differs between acute care hospital settings and outpatient surgery centers. And, even then, the standard of care being applied by the ambulatory surgical center, anesthesiologist and the gastroenterologist may not be the same. Read More
Tyler was 18-years old when he was admitted to hospital for a pain in his chest.
It was a collapsed lung – the second time he had experienced one that year, and a condition that tall, young, slim males like Tyler can be prone to. To permanently correct the problem, Tyler underwent a procedure called pleurodesis, a common procedure to permanently prevent his lung from collapsing again. Upon the successful completion of the surgery, Tyler’s mother, Victoria Ireland said that she “breathed a sigh of relief”. Her son was going to be OK; all he needed to do was recover. Read More
In an article published on March 13, the National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF) announced the first day of Patient Safety Awareness Week, as well as their merger with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Most importantly, the now-joint organizations restated a potent call to action: that preventable health care harm is a public health crisis and requires a coordinated public health response.
The Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety (PPAHS) echoes the call of NPSF and IHI for healthcare leaders to treat every week as patient safety week by initiating a coordinated public health response to improve patient safety and drive the collective work. Doing so would help ensure that patients, and those who care for them, are free from preventable harm.
Directly targeting preventable harm at the clinical level is a deeply interconnected – and nuanced – problem. It will take the concerted efforts of many stakeholders:
- Clinicians, key to the development and implementation of patient safety initiatives and sharing their successes and failures.
- Hospital administrators, capable of empower doctors, nurses, and other specialists by providing them with the resources to continuously improve quality of care.
- The academic community, who can ensure that patient safety interventions are high-quality through peer review.
- Patient safety organizations like the IHI and PPAHS, who can examine the big picture, spot trends, and call attention to highlights and lowlights.
- Public health agencies at the state and federal levels, who can transform the efforts by stakeholders described above into policy.
Most importantly, it will also involve actively engaging patients, who can play an active role in ensuring the safety of their own care by knowing their medical history, understanding which questions to ask, speaking up when something does not seem right, and following the instructions of their doctors and nurses.
Integrating stakeholders from across all of these groups is essential for the success of any coordinated public health response. This is a key reason why the PPAHS Board of Advisors consists of representatives from each of these stakeholder groups. It is also why we choose to work in tandem with other organizations on priority areas such as respiratory compromise: initiatives need to involve multiple stakeholders who bring with them diverse perspectives and skill sets.
The Respiratory Compromise Institute (RCI) embodies this level of coordination. Consisting of members such as the Society of Hospital Medicine, American Association for Respiratory Care, and CHEST/American College of Chest Physicians, RCI is a collaborative effort to improve opioid safety.
A recently-released report by RCI exemplifies the outcome of coordination and collaboration. The report identifies eight distinct subsets of respiratory compromise that pose a high risk of patient harm – and, most importantly, could be prevented with early detection and intervention. The manuscript is the result of a workshop organized by the National Association for the Medical Direction of Respiratory Care to address the unmet needs of respiratory compromise across the clinical spectrum. The writing committee was comprised of a diverse set of clinicians focusing on respiratory ailments – a collaborative group consisting of doctors, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Read the report here.
These kinds of reports are just one step in improving patient safety and help set direction for coordinated responses. It is up to us as a public health community – clinicians, administrators, patient safety organizations, public health agencies, as well as patients – to use this knowledge and take action to transform the standard of care in hospitals across the nation.
The Respiratory Compromise Institute (RCI) has recently published a new report titled “Respiratory Compromise as a New Paradigm for the Care of Vulnerable Hospitalized Patients”. PPAHS is a member of RCI, along with other health organizations such as the Society of Hospital Medicine, American Association for Respiratory Care, and CHEST/American College of Chest Physicians. Read More
The following is an excerpt of an article written by Michael Wong, JD (Executive Director, Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety). It first appeared on Healthcare Business Today on April 9, 2017. To read the full article, please click here.
As the Executive Director of the Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety, a non-profit whose mission is the improvement of patient safety, I am often asked how to tell a “good” hospital (i.e. patient safe) from a “bad” hospital (i.e. unsafe).
In thinking about “good” and “bad” hospital leadership, I am reminded of two discussions I had with hospital leaders – which leaders’ hospital would you rather be a patient at or, if you are a clinician, work at?
I spoke with the CEO of a hospital, who was dealing with the family of a child that had died within the hospital from opioid-induced respiratory depression. His clinicians had not employed continuous electronic monitoring with pulse oximetry for oxygenation or with capnography for adequacy of ventilation. Read More
The Physician-Patient Alliance for Health & Safety (PPAHS) has released a YouTube video which discusses in nine minutes how to improve opioid safety. The video features highlights from over 10 hours of in-depth interviews released by PPAHS in 2016; altogether, the podcast series has generated over 130,000 cumulative views on YouTube. The podcast series brings together physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists discussing how they have improved opioid safety in their hospitals.
According to Michael Wong, JD, Founder and Executive Director of PPAHS:
“In just nine minutes, the video summarizes experiences of clinicians in improving opioid safety in their hospital or healthcare facility, and reminds us of the tragic consequences of adverse events and deaths that may ensue if clinicians and healthcare executives are not proactive in promoting safety. We hope that the video will energize quality improvement and patient safety teams to strive to reduce adverse events and deaths related to opioid use.”
The opioid epidemic was one of the most heavily-covered, and hotly-debated, topic in patient safety covered in 2016. This dialogue has been mostly centered around the effects of ‘street’ use and abuse of prescription painkillers. In contrast, the PPAHS podcast series aims to highlight the preventable harm of opioid-induced respiratory depression during hospital procedures. Read More